semantic communication (SemCom) has emerged as a task-oriented communication paradigm that prioritizes meaning delivery over exact bit recovery. The integration of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) into SemCom further enables knowledge-guided inference, multimodal reconstruction, and semantic compression through architectures such as large language models, variational autoencoders, generative adversarial networks, and diffusion models. At the same time, this integration introduces new security and privacy risks, including semantic eavesdropping, model inversion, semantic jamming, covert backdoors, prompt manipulation, and knowledge-base leakage, which are not adequately captured by conventional communication security models. In this survey, we provide a security-centric review of GenAI-assisted semantic communication systems by organizing the literature according to threat models, attack surfaces, defence strategies, and semantic modalities across text, image, and multimodal settings. The survey was conducted using IEEE Xplore, ACM Digital Library, SpringerLink, arXiv, and Google Scholar. Approximately 180 papers were initially screened, and 53 representative studies published between 2021 and 2026 were selected for detailed review. Based on this analysis, we classify the major threats into adversarial perturbation, jamming, poisoning and backdoor attacks, privacy leakage and semantic eavesdropping, and generative-model-specific vulnerabilities involving diffusion, large language models, and multimodal foundation models. We further map the corresponding defences, including adversarial training, model ensembling, semantic-aware encryption, diffusion-guided denoising, privacy-preserving representation learning, and secure resource allocation. The survey also identifies persistent open challenges, including the lack of standardized semantic security metrics, unified benchmarks, cross-layer evaluation frameworks, and robust defences for GenAI-native and multimodal semantic communication systems. Overall, this work provides a structured reference for the design of secure, trustworthy, and attack-resilient generative semantic communication systems for future intelligent networks.
Naqvi et al. (Thu,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: