Det Norske Misjonsselskap (Norwegian Missionary Society, NMS) was founded in Stavanger, Norway, in 1842. Having established its first mission field in Africa, it then made plans to work in Asia. In 1902, the first missionaries were sent out to Hunan, an inland, culturally isolated, and conservative Chinese province that experienced particularly strong anti-foreigner and anti-Christian waves. This article argues that the NMS developed a distinctive, pragmatic strategy of political accommodation—rooted in its Pietistic Lutheran social ethos and a Norwegian pioneering spirit—to ensure its institutional survival in Hunan. Examining the NMS’s responses to two major political turning points, the Anti-Christian Movement (1924–1927) and the New Life Movement (1934–1937), the article reveals three key findings: First, the NMS’s proclaimed “neutrality” was not merely a passive stance but an active survival tactic, evolving from a claim grounded in Norway’s geopolitical neutrality into a strategic rhetoric for navigating local political risks. Second, the missionaries’ “excessive expectations” of the Nationalist government, particularly during the New Life Movement, stemmed from a structural cognitive bias shaped by their deep institutional embedding in the KMT-governed local order. Third, their ultimate withdrawal was less a simple political misjudgement than the logical endpoint of a survival model that lacked a contingency plan for revolutionary change. By tracing this specific case, the article contributes to the historiography of Christianity in modern China by illuminating the diversity of missionary strategies beyond the dominant Anglo-American coastal narratives.
Wuna Zhou (Wed,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: