Correction: Knowledge, attitudes and practices of clinicians in Shenzhen regarding pediatric streptococcal pharyngitis diagnosis and treatment

Thank you for the assistance provided in improving on our manuscript (Manuscript ID 1712298) entitled "Knowledge, attitudes, and practices of clinicians in Shenzhen regarding pediatric streptococcal pharyngitis diagnosis and treatment". After verifying again, we identified discrepancies and documented them in the Errata as follows. The raw data utilised for the purpose of verification can be accessed via Nutstore at the following link: https://www.jianguoyun.com/p/DUHqwRoQ3onsCxiym58GIAA.The reasons for the corrections are as follows:Table 5: The statistical value for "Hospital Level" in the univariate analysis has been corrected. This correction was made due to an error in the numerical position.Table 6: The correlation coefficient for knowledge-attitude has been corrected. The correlation coefficient (*r* value) was originally mistakenly reported as a *p*-value.Table 9: The number of participants in each group for "Tonsillectomy nonrecommendations (n) " and the total number have been corrected. This was due to an error in summation during statistical compilation.The sample size for "Class I" in the "Hospital Grade" grouping has been corrected from "151" to "38";The sample size for "Class III grade-A" has been corrected from "38" to "151".table 9(Correlation Between GAS Pharyngitis Recurrence Frequency and Tonsillectomy)Correct the number of participants in the "1-3" group who were "Tonsillectomy nonrecommendations (n)" from "146" to "73"; Correct the number of patients in the "4-6" group for whom "Tonsillectomy nonrecommendations (n)" from "38" to "19"; Correct the number of patients in the "7-10" group for whom "Tonsillectomy nonrecommendations (n)" from "8" to "4";Correct the number of individuals in the "11-20" group for whom "Tonsillectomy non-recommendations (n)" from "14" to "7";Correct the total number of individuals for whom "Tonsillectomy nonrecommendations (n)" from "206" to "103".The yellow highlight indicates that the original report has not yet been updated and needs to be corrected. Thank you!There was a mistake in figure / The original version of this article has been updated.Adding/removing text In the abstract, Knowledge scores correlated with attitude and practice scores (p 0.05). This has been corrected to read:Knowledge score correlated with practice score (r = 0.351, p 0.05) and practice score (r = 0.072, p > 0.05)The original version of this article has been updated.Adding/removing text Significant positive correlations of the knowledge score with the attitude (p = 0.048) and practice (p = 0.0035) scores were identified. No significant correlation was found between the attitude and practice scores (p = 0.072; Table 6)..A correction has been made to the section Name of Section, subsection Name of Sub-section if there is one, Paragraph Number: "A significant positive correlation between the knowledge and practice scores was identified (r = 0.351, p 0.05), nor between the attitude and practice scores (r = 0.072, p > 0.05; Table 6)."The original version of this article has been updated. These corrections do not affect the original study conclusions.All calculations and statistics were revised and confirmed to be correct.With best wishes, Yours sincerely, Shuting Zhuang