Background: 2-Methylmethcathinone (2‑MMC) is a chiral new psychoactive substance whose enantiomers may differ in pharmacological and toxicological behavior. Reliable enantioselective analysis is therefore required for forensic and environmental applications. Recent work shows that polysaccharide-based chiral stationary phases (CSPs) are broadly effective for cathinones 1. Objective: This study aims to develop and optimize a rapid, robust high-performance liquid chromatography with ultraviolet detection (HPLC‑UV) method achieving baseline separation resolution (Rs) ≥ 1.5 of 2‑MMC enantiomers. Methods: A two‑stage workflow was used. First, a screening compared a Lux AMP 3 µm (150 × 4.6 mm) under ammonium bicarbonate (pH 11) with methanol or acetonitrile (isocratic/gradient) against a Lux Amylose‑1 3 µm (150 × 4.6 mm) operated in normal‑phase (n‑hexane/isopropanol). Ultraviolet detection was set at 254 nm. Performance criteria included Rs and run time. Results: The Lux AMP configuration yielded limited enantioresolution across tested conditions (maximum Rs ≈ 1.11). In contrast, Lux Amylose‑1, with n‑hexane/isopropanol as mobile phase, produced baseline separation of 2‑MMC enantiomers (Rs > 1.5) with short analysis times and consistent retention, providing suitable peak shape and repeatability. These outcomes align with literature showing high success rates of amylose/cellulose CSPs for cathinones under normal‑phase and polar‑organic modes 2,3. Conclusions: The screening‑to‑optimization strategy delivered a fast enantioselective HPLC‑UV method for 2‑MMC. Beyond analytical separation, the method provides a robust platform to develop and adapt enantioselective procedures for biological samples (e.g., oral fluid, blood, urine), enabling enantiomer‑resolved quantification in clinical and forensic toxicology.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Sara Gojkovic
Ivan Langa
Virgínia Gonçalves
Science Letters
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Gojkovic et al. (Fri,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69fbe3aa164b5133a91a2d8e — DOI: https://doi.org/10.48797/sl.2026.496
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: