The equine reproductive microbiota has emerged as an important factor influencing reproductive health and fertility in both mares and stallions. Traditionally, the equine uterus was considered sterile, and microbial presence was interpreted primarily in the context of infection. However, sequencing-based studies have demonstrated that the reproductive tract, including the uterus and semen, contains detectable microbial communities or microbial DNA signatures, challenging this traditional paradigm. In mares, the vaginal microbiota is consistently dominated by Firmicutes, Bacteroidetes, Proteobacteria, and Actinobacteria, whereas the uterine environment represents a low-biomass niche in which interpretation is complicated by contamination risk and the inability of sequencing-based methods to distinguish viable from nonviable microorganisms. Culture-based studies consistently identify opportunistic pathogens such as Streptococcus equi subsp. zooepidemicus, Escherichia coli, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa in association with endometritis and persistent breeding-induced endometritis, while sequencing-based studies suggest broader community-level dysbiosis rather than simple pathogen presence. In stallions, semen is not sterile and commonly contains taxa such as Porphyromonas, Corynebacterium, Peptoniphilus, and other opportunistic bacteria that may influence sperm quality and microbial transmission to mares during breeding. However, most reported associations remain correlative, and direct longitudinal evidence for persistent stallion-to-mare microbial transmission is limited. This review synthesizes current evidence on microbial composition, hormonal influences, dysbiosis, and reproductive implications of the equine reproductive microbiota, integrating culture-based and sequencing-based findings while emphasizing methodological limitations associated with low-biomass samples. Improved understanding of these microbial ecosystems may support more evidence-based reproductive diagnostics and microbiome-informed fertility management in horses.
Pelenė et al. (Tue,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: