OBJECTIVE: Probabilistic mapping is increasingly used to identify optimal stimulation regions (Probabilistic Sweet Spots, PSS) in Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS). Outcomes, however, depend on workflow parameters. This study examined how methodological and data-handling choices affect PSS stability and spatial consistency across varying sample sizes. METHODS: Intraoperative stimulation test data from 36 Parkinson's Disease patients were analyzed. PSS were computed across increasing sample sizes using four statistical approaches: Bayesian t-test (BAYES), Logistic Regression Model (LRM), Wilcoxon test with FDR correction (WFDR), and Wilcoxon test with permutation correction (WPERM). We assessed the effects of statistical tests, hemispheric data handling, and masking parameters (i.e., minimum number of patients and stimulations per voxel) on PSS stability and consistency, evaluated in terms of size and spatial location. RESULTS: BAYES was more robust at small to intermediate sample sizes, while WFDR and LRM stabilized only in larger cohorts (∼25-30 patients). WPERM consistently underperformed. Stability was higher in the left hemisphere. Combining hemispheres did not improve stability, suggesting asymmetries in stimulation effects. Masking parameters mainly affected PSS volume, with stricter thresholds reducing absolute size, but did not alter stability patterns. CONCLUSION: Statistical test choice, hemispheric analysis, and masking parameters strongly influence PSS outcomes. The Bayesian t-test is recommended for small to intermediate cohorts, and hemispheres should be analyzed separately to avoid masking clinically relevant asymmetries. SIGNIFICANCE: By highlighting the interplay between sample size, statistical methods, hemispheric data, and masking strategies, this work contributes to standardizing probabilistic mapping practices and improving their reliability for clinical translation.
Bucciarelli et al. (Thu,) studied this question.