Abstract Background and aims Sex-related differences in outcomes after acute stroke remain incompletely understood and may vary by stroke subtype. We conducted a post-hoc analysis of the INTERACT4 trial to evaluate the association between sex and 90-day outcomes and whether this association differs by stroke subtype. Methods INTERACT4 is a multicenter, ambulance-delivered, prospective, randomized, clinical trial in Chinese patients suspected with acute stroke. We included participants with available 90-day follow-up and excluded stroke mimics. The primary outcome was 90-day modified Rankin Scale (mRS) shift; secondary outcomes included functional independence and death. Ordinal/logistic regression models estimated adjusted odds ratios (ORs). Effect modification by stroke subtype was tested using interaction terms. Results Among all stroke patients (female n=863; male n=1377), women were older, had different vascular risk profiles, and presented with more severe neurological deficits on hospital arrival. Overall, sex was not independently associated with 90-day mRS shift after adjustment (OR 1.03, 95% CI 0.86-1.23; P=0.741). Associations differed by subtype: in AIS, male sex was associated with reduced odds of worse mRS shift (OR 0.78, 95% CI 0.61-0.99; P=0.043), whereas in ICH, male sex was associated with worse mRS shift (OR 1.44, 95% CI 1.10-1.89; P=0.008), higher mortality (OR 1.80, 95% CI 1.20-2.71; P=0.005), and lower functional independence (OR 0.60, 95% CI 0.41–0.89; P=0.012). Interactions were significant for mRS shift (P0.001), functional independence (P=0.009), and death (P=0.035). Conclusions In this Chinese trial population, sex-outcome associations differed by stroke subtype: male favored outcomes in AIS, while female favored outcomes in ICH. Conflict of interest nothing to disclose
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Feifeng Liu
Chen Chen
Xiaoyan Yu
European Stroke Journal
Fudan University
The George Institute for Global Health
Shanghai East Hospital
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Liu et al. (Fri,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69fd7e90bfa21ec5bbf06d77 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/esj/aakag023.299
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: