Over a mean follow-up of 84.6 months, outcome events occurred in 14% of patients who underwent PFO closure for secondary stroke prevention, including recurrent ischemic stroke in 6%.
Cohort (n=89)
89 patients who underwent patent foramen ovale (PFO) closure due to ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack, median age 45 years.
Patent foramen ovale (PFO) closure
Long-term outcomes including recurrent ischemic stroke (RIS), atrial fibrillation (AF), systemic thromboembolism (ST), myocardial infarction (MI), and all-cause mortalityhard clinical
Long-term follow-up of patients undergoing PFO closure for secondary stroke prevention demonstrates a 14% rate of recurrent cardiovascular or cerebrovascular events, emphasizing the critical need for rigorous patient selection using tools like the RoPE score.
Abstract Background and aims Patent foramen ovale (PFO) is associated with cryptogenic stroke, particularly in young adults with atrial septal aneurysm. This study aimed to evaluate long-term outcomes in a cohort of patients who underwent PFO closure for secondary stroke prevention. Methods This retrospective study included patients who underwent PFO closure between 1 January 2008 and 31 December 2023 due to ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack. RoPE and PASCAL scores were calculated from clinical data at the time of the index cerebrovascular event. Long-term outcomes, identified through electronic medical records, included recurrent ischemic stroke (RIS), atrial fibrillation (AF), systemic thromboembolism (ST), myocardial infarction (MI), and all-cause mortality. Results A total of 89 patients were included, with a median age of 45 years (IQR 21), and the mean follow-up duration was 84.6 months (SD 51.7). Outcome events occurred in 14% of patients, including RIS in 6% (median 16.7 months, IQR 14.0), AF in 3% (median time to event 2.3 months, IQR 57), ST in 3% (median 62.5 months, IQR 60.6), and MI in 2% (median 104.3 months, IQR 8.4). Two patients died. A RoPE score ≥7 was observed in 56% of patients. Among patients with RIS, RoPE scores were predominantly 6-7 (median 6, IQR 1), while PASCAL classification was mainly “possible” or “unlikely”. Conclusions These findings underscore the importance of carefully selecting patients for PFO closure, considering that the PFO may not be causally related to the index stroke. Risk stratification remains essential, as recurrent ischemic stroke and cardiovascular events may occur despite closure. Conflict of interest Nothing to disclose
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Adele Karolina Kõre
University of Tartu
Kaur Kirsimäe
University of Tartu
Riina Vibo
Tartu University Hospital
European Stroke Journal
University of Tartu
Tartu University Hospital
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Kõre et al. (Fri,) conducted a cohort in Patent foramen ovale with ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack (n=89). PFO closure was evaluated on Long-term outcomes including recurrent ischemic stroke, atrial fibrillation, systemic thromboembolism, myocardial infarction, and all-cause mortality. Over a mean follow-up of 84.6 months, outcome events occurred in 14% of patients who underwent PFO closure for secondary stroke prevention, including recurrent ischemic stroke in 6%.
synapsesocial.com/papers/69fd7ef7bfa21ec5bbf073e3 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/esj/aakag023.391