Does favorable AI-ICV on NCCT predict favorable clinical outcomes in acute ischemic stroke patients treated with reperfusion therapies?
290 consecutive acute ischemic stroke patients undergoing admission NCCT+CTP and treated with reperfusion-therapies (EVT and/or IVT) from a prospective registry across three stroke-centers, mean age 71.8, median NIHSS 10. 49% presented in late-window.
Favorable AI-based infarct core volume estimation on noncontrast CT (AI-ICV ≤35 mL)
Unfavorable AI-based infarct core volume estimation on noncontrast CT (AI-ICV >35 mL)
Favorable outcome (mRS 0–2 at 3-months)hard clinical
Favorable AI-based infarct core volume estimation on noncontrast CT independently predicts favorable 3-month outcomes in acute ischemic stroke patients undergoing reperfusion therapy.
Abstract Background and aims CTP has been used to guide reperfusion selection in late-window stroke. Recently, AI-based infarct core volume estimation on NCCT (AI-ICV, Methinks) has been associated to clinical outcomes. We investigated the association between AI-ICV, CTP-patterns, and outcomes in reperfused stroke patients. Methods Consecutive patients undergoing admission NCCT+CTP and treated with reperfusion-therapies (EVT and/or IVT) were collected from a prospective registry across three stroke-centers (January 2021–May 2024). Admission AI-ICV was categorized as favorable (≤35 mL) or unfavorable (35 mL) based on prior observations. CTP-patterns were automatically determined (rCBF30%; RAPID/IschemiaView) and categorized per EXTEND criteria as favorable or unfavorable. Late-window thrombolysis was defined as symptom onset–to–arrival 4hours. Outcomes were favorable outcome (mRS 0–2 at 3-months) and symptomatic-intracranial-hemorrhage(sICH) Results From 290 patients included (mean age 71.8 SD±14.6 years; median NIHSS 10IQR:5–18); 49% presented in late-window. Primary-EVT was performed in 54.1%, and 20% received IV-thrombolysis only. Favorable outcome occurred in 54.1% Overall, favorable AI-ICV was associated with favorable outcome (63.9% vs 36.0%, p0.001) and remained independently associated after adjustment for CTP-pattern, age, and baseline NIHSS (OR 3.03, 95% CI 1.56–5.88; p=0.001, Figure1). Similar associations were observed in late-window (OR:3.91, 95% CI:1.23–12.47; p=0.021, Figure2). No association was observed between sICH and either AI-ICV or CTP-pattern. Conclusions Among reperfusion treated patients with available CTP, favorable AI-ICV on NCCT independently predicted favorable outcome, including in late-window, These finding support further evaluation of AI-ICV-based selection for reperfusion therapies, particularly late-window thrombolysis Conflict of interest Dr Ortega-Gutierrez: Grants: NIH-NINDS (R01NS127114-01, R03NS126804), PCORI, Stryker, Medtronics, Microvention, IschemiaView, Viz.ai, and Siemens. Consultant: Medtronic and Stryker Neurovascular. Dr Ribó is the Chief Medical Office of Methinks and has equity interests. Consultant: AptaTargets, Cerenovus, Medtronic, Philips, Stryker. Stock: Anaconda, Nora Figure 1 - belongs to Results Figure 2 - belongs to Results
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
alan Flores
Santiago Ortega-Gutierrez
Xavier Ustrell Roig
European Stroke Journal
University of Iowa
Vall d'Hebron Hospital Universitari
Hospital Universitari Joan XXIII de Tarragona
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Flores et al. (Fri,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69fd7f0dbfa21ec5bbf0772c — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/esj/aakag023.729