Abstract Background and aims The LAST-long trial investigated the effects of a multimodal follow-up after stroke and found no improvement in functional outcome. The present sub-study aimed to assess whether the intervention affected next-of-kin’s stress and caregiving time. Methods LAST-long was a Norwegian multi-center randomized controlled trial comparing an 18-month intervention to standard care. The intervention comprised monthly meetings with a stroke coordinator including structured assessments and supported individualized goal setting. Next-of-kin were evaluated using the Relatives Stress Scale and a questionnaire on employment and caregiving time. Group differences were analyzed using linear mixed models. Results Next-of-kin data were available for 260 of 301 patients at one or more of four follow-ups. Patients were 46% women, with mean age 71.1 (SD 12.3) years and mean baseline modified Rankin Scale 1.7 (SD 0.9). At inclusion, 67% of next-of-kins in the intervention group and 73% in the control group lived with the patient, of these proportions employed were 45% and 48%, respectively. 8% and 12% reported reduced or discontinued working due to caregiving. Relatives Stress Scale scores were similar; at baseline 10.7 (of 60) and 10.6. At 18 months scores were 7.9 and 9.9 (P = 0.52). Mean estimated weekly caregiving hours did also not differ significantly between groups during follow-up: 5.7 (95% CI, 4.5–6.8) in the intervention group and 4.1 (95% CI, 2.9–5.4) in the control group (P = 0.082). Conclusions In this sub-study, long-term follow-up by a stroke coordinator did not give significant differences in next-of-kin stress or caregiving time compared to standard care. Conflict of interest All authors: nothing to disclose.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Sara Rise Langlo
Øystein Døhl
Håkon Ihle‐Hansen
European Stroke Journal
Norwegian University of Science and Technology
St Olav's University Hospital
Akershus University Hospital
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Langlo et al. (Fri,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69fd7f3abfa21ec5bbf079bb — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/esj/aakag023.086