PRIMARY REFERENCE DOCUMENT: The Unified "Constitution" of the NEUROBAQI Architecture This project presents the "Four-Layer Doctrine," the ultimate and overarching theoretical framework for clinical AI safety. While Dossier 1 (DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/4T3PF) and Dossier 2 (NBQ-D02-V2.0.1) provided empirical proof-of-concept case studies, this document serves as the definitive "Constitution" that encompasses, organizes, and elevates all prior research. Researchers, reviewers, and institutions are strongly advised to read this document as their primary reference to understand the architecture in its entirety. This comprehensive working paper systematically defines the complete systemic hierarchy: 1. Algorithmic Sovereignty: The governing post-anthropocentric philosophy. 2. Cognitive Safety Systems (CSS): The new interdisciplinary academic discipline mapping human error as a systemic vulnerability. 3. Autonomous Cognitive Prosthetics (ACP): The technology class designed to intercept errors at the moment of failure. 4. The Application Ecosystem: The practical implementation through NEUROBAQI and SHAFIMED. Furthermore, this paper formally introduces the E4E (Eye for an Eye) Autonomous Veto Module, a groundbreaking system designed to detect and physically block the "Perception-Action Gap" (Cognitive Betrayal) as a newly defined clinical threat model. It bridges the gap between biological perception (vision) and semantic interpretation (reasoning) through a deterministic safety layer. COPYRIGHT NOTICE: All architectural derivatives, commercial rights, and implementation rights (including SHAFIMED, E4E, and NEUROBAQI frameworks) are strictly reserved by the author. This strict licensing retroactively applies to all prior publications in this series. Licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Elif Rana NURBAKI
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Elif Rana NURBAKI (Thu,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69fd7f4fbfa21ec5bbf07d0a — DOI: https://doi.org/10.17605/osf.io/q67a8
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: