Wind resource assessment (WRA) in densely forested and complex terrain remains challenging due to strong canopy-induced turbulence and enhanced wind shear, which significantly affect wind flow characteristics and increase modeling uncertainties. Methods relying on Plant Area Density (PAD) or Leaf Area Density (LAD) estimation require costly airborne surveys and site-specific calibration, limiting their industrial applicability. Based on a scientific collaboration between Meteodyn and EDF Power, this study proposes a complete and reproducible Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) methodology built around an Iterative Model Adjustment (IMA) procedure implemented in Meteodyn WT™ to improve wind resource assessment accuracy in highly forested areas using standard industrial inputs. The IMA procedure iteratively calibrates the canopy drag coefficient and forest model parameters using wind speed profile measurements from a single reference mast until the simulated wind shear matches observations. The methodology was evaluated at three sites located in Finland, France, and Scotland, yielding six calibration and cross-prediction cases under heterogeneous forest and complex terrain conditions. Cross-prediction uncertainties were reduced significantly, with horizontal mean speed errors decreasing from the range 1.0–9.5% to 0.5–2.2% and a global mean absolute error of approximately 1.1%. The study provides new physical insight into the sensitivity of the canopy drag force term within RANS-based forest models, showing that both drag coefficient and canopy height have a comparable and jointly necessary influence on wind shear simulation. These findings demonstrate that robust and accurate wind resource assessment can be achieved in complex terrain and forested areas without relying on remote-sensing-derived canopy density datasets, providing a pragmatic and industrially scalable alternative.
Leonard et al. (Wed,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: