Human-machine shared control represents a pivotal transitional phase between traditional and fully autonomous driving, and has increasingly attracted scholarly attention in recent years. To address the issue of human-machine conflict in shared steering control, this study proposes a personalized human-machine shared control approach that accounts for individual driver differences. First, to characterize the interaction between the driver and the Advanced Driver Assistance System (ADAS), a non-cooperative game-based human-machine shared control framework based on Model Predictive Control (MPC) is established. Subsequently, to achieve personalized shared control, a driving authority allocation strategy is developed based on assessing collision severity and the driver capability, enabling individualized shared control through personalized authority weights. Ultimately, the effectiveness of the proposed non-cooperative Nash game-based human-machine shared steering strategy and the flexible authority allocation scheme is validated through driver-in-the-loop experiments. Experimental results show that the proposed human-machine shared control strategy mitigates the driver’s operational burden, improves driving safety, and enables personalized authority adaptation in accordance with individual driver characteristics.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
X Zhang
He He
Wenxin Zhang
Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part D Journal of Automobile Engineering
Jiangsu University
Beijing VDJBio (China)
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Zhang et al. (Fri,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0021e6c8f74e3340f9cd0d — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/09544070261446368