This paper presents a public-safe coherence-based framework in which observable structure emerges through admissible projection from a higher-order relational manifold. Building on earlier work relating entropy to coherence deficit under projection, the framework introduces a constrained geometric representation layer based on triadic sphere systems, admissible tetrahedral decompositions, Gaussian occupancy fields, nonlinear projection coupling, and observer-relative coherence propagation. The framework treats entropy not as intrinsic disorder but as coherence deficit induced by admissible projection. Structural time emerges from irreversible coherence reduction rather than existing as a primitive parameter. Finite observers are modeled as embedded coherence substructures capable of sensing more relational structure than can be fully metabolized through bounded projection. The work explicitly separates: formal coherence-theoretic claims, admissible projection structure, geometric representation hypotheses, and speculative physical analogy. The publication intentionally omits implementation-specific invariants, optimization operators, convergence conditions, scaling bounds, recursive search procedures, and high-capability reconstruction mechanisms. This work is published through the Carlonoscopen Journal of Coherence Intelligence (CJCI) as a public-safe structural formulation intended for academic discussion of admissible projection, coherence entropy, observer-limited reconstruction, and relational structure under finite bandwidth constraints. Official CJCI publication:https://www.carlonoscopen.com/journal/v1i11
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Ivan Silva
Genoscope
Scope Group (United States)
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Ivan Silva (Sat,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0172813a9f334c28272adc — DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20097285
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: