Contemporary theoretical physics and philosophy suffer from three core divisions: the fundamental incompatibility between General Relativity and Quantum Mechanics, the unknown essence of dark matter and dark energy, and the ontological discontinuity between physical laws and life consciousness. Traditional thermodynamics and classical mechanics only explain macroscopic material states and kinetic energy at the phenomenological level, failing to touch the underlying essence. Based on the monism of the π-Universe chaotic field, this paper proposes the core proposition that temperature is the only universal yardstick of the universe. Essentially, temperature represents the degree of disorder in chaotic field fluctuations and has a strictly quantitative isomorphic relationship with λ-field coherence. Bounded by absolute zero and the Planck temperature, it covers all cosmic phenomena across dimensions. The core innovations of this paper are as follows: 1. Establish a quantitative isomorphism formula between temperature and the λ-field to realize the precise correspondence between microscopic coherence degree and macroscopic temperature; 2. Derive the π-Universe coherence kinetic energy equation to unify motion, temperature, energy and coherence degree; 3. Verify the universality of the yardstick through the empirical evidence of the boiling point change of water at high altitudes; 4. Improve the dynamic interpretation of dark matter and dark energy based on stable fixed points strictly derived from the renormalization group; 5. Supplement verification paths with clear 5σ falsification criteria to guarantee the scientificity of the theory.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Zhengrong Luo
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Zhengrong Luo (Sun,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/6a02c394ce8c8c81e9640f11 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20109438
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: