This paper challenges the dominant assumption that innovation failure in established organizations is primarily a problem of execution. Instead, it argues that failure is often structural: well-managed organizations are systematically designed to eliminate deviation before it has the opportunity to evolve.I introduce the concept of the selection-before-evolution trap, in which early-stage ideas are subjected to the performance criteria of the core business—such as predictability, margin, and alignment—long before their uncertainty can be resolved. Under these conditions, potentially valuable innovations are filtered out not because they lack merit, but because they are evaluated using inappropriate selection mechanisms.Building on this insight, the paper distinguishes between two fundamentally different management logics: core logic, which optimizes proven business models, and frontier logic, which enables the exploration and evolution of non-conforming opportunities. I propose a practical framework—the Corporate Evolution Dashboard—to guide leaders in aligning evaluation criteria, resource allocation, and governance structures with the stage of innovation.The paper contributes to the literature on innovation management by shifting the focus from execution failure to premature selection, and by highlighting the role of organizational evaluation systems as a primary constraint on innovation survival.
Fan Zhao (Thu,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: