Background: Burn patients are highly susceptible to hospital-acquired infections (HAIs), and contaminated near-patient surfaces can act as reservoirs for multidrug-resistant organisms (MROs). Ultraviolet-C (UV-C) room disinfection is increasingly used as an adjunct to manual cleaning, but real-world data in adult burns settings remain limited. Methods: We evaluated adjunctive UV-C disinfection in a tertiary adult trauma and burns surgical ward using a two-part observational design. Part A compares MRO-related HAI incidence before UV-C implementation (12 May 2015–11 May 2020; retrospective) with its incidence after implementation (14 July 2020–13 July 2021; prospective). Part B is a matched pre/post environmental sampling study (December 2022–December 2024) of 44 vacant rooms. Paired swabs from a single randomised high-touch surface per room were collected immediately before and after UV-C disinfection and processed by an independent laboratory. Results: Part A included 7589 admissions (6415 before-UV-C; 1174 after-UV-C) with 2728 UV-C cycles delivered after implementation. MRO-related HAI incidence decreased from 18.3 to 10.2 per 1000 bed-days (p < 0.01). In Part B, the proportion of swabs with <10 CFU increased after UV-C disinfection (66% vs. 50%, p = 0.02). Among swabs with non-negligible baseline contamination and excluding increases, the median CFU reduction was 97% (SD 12%; p < 0.001), with no significant differences in reduction across sampled surface types. Conclusion: In an adult burns surgical ward, adjunctive UV-C disinfection was associated with reduced MRO-related HAI incidence and a substantial reduction in environmental bioburden on high-touch surfaces. These real-world findings support UV-C as a feasible adjunct to standard cleaning in high-risk burn services and inform future controlled evaluations.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
E. Zvi
Melissa Neely
Louise Higgins
European Burn Journal
Monash University
Alfred Health
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Zvi et al. (Mon,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0414f679e20c90b4444cc2 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ebj7020025