Speakability of Suffering and Media Ecologies: A Coupled Model of Suicide Risk

Suicide is commonly approached through clinical and psychological frameworks centred on the individual, alongside social explanations emphasising collective conditions. These perspectives offer complementary leverage for understanding and preventing suicidal behaviour. Between these levels, a clinically decisive segment can be specified with greater precision for psychiatric practice, namely the processes through which suffering becomes speakable, socially legitimate and clinically actionable, or is displaced into self-censorship, isolation and delayed help-seeking. This paper advances a service-facing biosemiotic model of suicide risk that formalises this segment as a communicative infrastructure and links it to the public circulation of suicide narratives across media and digital environments. The model comprises two coupled modules. The first, the communicative-classification module, characterises labelling and delegitimation operations that allocate epistemic credibility to crisis talk, foster self-stigma and increase the social cost of disclosing suffering. The second, the public-feedback module, specifies how media representation and repetition regulate the symbolic availability of narrative scripts, with closure- and openness-oriented configurations positioned along the Werther–Papageno continuum. Coupling the modules yields testable propositions concerning mediation via anticipated sanction and moderation by stigma and speakability and identifies conditions under which protective content may show limited translation into help-seeking behaviour. Implications are outlined for how the model may inform therapeutic risk assessment, continuity of care, and prevention. These implications are framed as hypotheses and implementation-relevant considerations derived from the model, with emphasis on (i) operationalising speakability as a clinically evaluable dimension, (ii) identifying institutional conditions that may reduce the communicative cost of help-seeking, and (iii) aligning public communication strategies with international reporting standards. The model is intended to support future empirical testing rather than to establish effectiveness at this stage.