The freedoms related to a person's thought are closely related to the thought of the person and contribute to the formation of his opinion as he wishes and aim for the person to be free to express his opinion in the way he wants without any obstacles, whether his expression is in words or in writing. Reason, therefore, is far from the control of rulers and the authority of the law, except that this expression enjoys external manifestations that have external outward effects, and at that time they are not far from the control of rulers and the authority of the law, and this is why the constitution stipulates the guarantee of freedoms related to human thought, Foremost among which is freedom of expression, freedom of education, the right to vote and run for office. However, despite the constitutional texts guaranteeing these freedoms, the administration continued with the power it possessed to try to restrict these freedoms, and here the administrative judiciary has the task of monitoring the work of the administration, as this control is considered One of the most important guarantees for the freedoms of individuals in exchange for the powers that the administration possesses, in terms of canceling administrative decisions that violate the freedoms of individuals guaranteed by the constitution, and it is at the same time a warning to the administration about the necessity of deliberation before issuing any administrative decision that affects the freedoms related to human thought.
Saleh et al. (Wed,) studied this question.