Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Initially, environmental debt was seen as a tool aimed at rebalancing the relationships between the North and the South, Civil society and Southern countries demanded financial compensation for the damages inflicted on their environment and natural resources. Some actors attempted to link this presumed environmental debt with the actual financial debts burdening the budgets of developing countries, claiming the right to compensation. However, none of these demands received support from the international community, Subsequently, countries introduced a more diplomatic approach, stating that this environmental debt should not be seen as a synonymous "fine" for the sins of Northern countries, but rather as a redistribution of the development benefits gained by past generations in favor of future generations. The environmental debt was used as a basis to demand assistance for sustainable development and to achieve environmental justice in the distribution of the burdens of environmental preservation and pollution control, in accordance with international policies for managing ecological systems. Additionally, it aimed to protect indigenous populations by restoring their rights to their lands, particularly their ability to participate in decision-making processes that affect them.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
غفران القيسي
Hossam Khalaf
University of Baghdad
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
القيسي et al. (Sun,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/6a06b7a1e7dec685947aa5f2 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.37651/aujlps.2024.150233.1268