Correction: Immunosenescence and metabolic reprogramming in MASLD: an age-dependent immunometabolic vicious cycle and therapeutic opportunities

• Please read through all the templates before choosing • Pick the most relevant text template(s) from the following page and delete all others. • Edit the text as necessary, ensuring that the original incorrect text is included for the record, please see the below. • Please do not use any extra formatting when editing the templates, and only modify the red text unless absolutely necessary • Submit to Frontiers following the instructions on this page.When the original text contained incorrect information, to preserve the scientific record, please include that text when editing the below templates. For example:There was a mistake in the Funding statement, an incorrect number was used. The correct number is "2015C03Bd051.". The publisher apologizes for this mistake.The original version of this article has been updated. Wrong content There was a mistake in figure1 as published. Dear Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology Editorial Office I am writing regarding our published article, " Immunosenescence and metabolic reprogramming in MASLD: an age-dependent immunometabolic vicious cycle and therapeutic opportunities." A concern about Figure 1has recently been raised on PubPeer: https://pubpeer.com/publications/818D3FB8ABBE3E738160A73FC0D74E/ After carefully reviewing the issue, I would like to provide a clear explanation and sincerely apologize for the confusion caused. The figure was created by us as an original schematic illustration. In preparing it, we referred to existing educational and reference materials for the general visual style of cell differentiation and morphology, and then produced our own schematic elements. However, although the figure was intended as an original cartoon-style illustration rather than a direct reproduction of any published figure, we recognize that the visual similarity of some parts is too high and may reasonably give rise to copyright or originality concerns. This was an oversight on our part, and we sincerely acknowledge the mistake. The similar areas in the image have been circled, and we are now requesting to replace them with new images that do not infringe on copyright.The corrected figure1 appears below.The original version of this article has been updated.Commons CC-BY license and permission must be obtained for use of copyrighted material from other sources (including re-published/adapted/modified/partial figures and images from the internet). It is the responsibility of the authors to acquire the licenses, to follow any citation instructions requested by third-party rights holders, and cover any supplementary charges.here, please contact the journal's editorial office.