Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
ABSTRACT Purpose To develop and validate a magnetic field‐based method for self‐registration of multicoil (MC) shim hardware in MRI systems, enabling accurate B 0 field control despite nonreproducible hardware placement between calibration and experimental sessions. Methods An algorithm was designed to estimate rigid transformations between 3D field maps acquired during hardware calibration (Reference field) and subsequent experiments (Measured field). Hardware misplacement was determined by co‐registration of the two fields within a defined region of interest. Simulations using Biot–Savart–derived MC basis fields and experimental validation with a 48‐channel MC array at 3 T were used to quantify localization accuracy under varying signal‐to‐noise ratio (SNR) levels. A genetic algorithm optimized coil currents to generate a Reference field shape that yielded minimal self‐registration error. Results Simulations and measurements demonstrated that submillimeter (≤ 0.5 mm) and subdegree (≤ 0.5°) localization accuracy is achievable at practical SNR levels (≥ 5). Errors decreased with increasing SNR and field complexity. The optimized field produced by the genetic algorithm yielded the lowest mean translation error (0.20 mm) and rotation error (0.11°), consistent with theoretical predictions. Self‐registration computation required less than 10 s per case. Conclusion The proposed field‐based self‐registration method enables rapid, accurate localization of MC shim hardware using only MR‐acquired field maps, eliminating the need for external tracking hardware or repeated calibrations. This approach enhances reproducibility of MC field control and supports improved B 0 shimming performance in insert‐based or repositionable MR systems.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Isabelle Zinghini
Ian Macleod
Carlotta Ianniello
Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
Columbia University
Yale University
New York University
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Zinghini et al. (Tue,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0567e9a550a87e60a20338 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.70413