What question did this study set out to answer?

This study investigates early landing kinematics in individuals post ACL reconstruction during sport return.

May 15, 2026Open Access

Task dependent early landing kinematics after return to sport in individuals with ACL reconstruction: a secondary analysis

Key Points

This study investigates early landing kinematics in individuals post ACL reconstruction during sport return.
Secondary analysis of a 3D motion capture dataset with 19 ACLR participants and 22 healthy controls.
Assessment of knee, ankle, and pelvic joint angles at initial contact and subsequent intervals during two specific tasks under fatigued and non-fatigued conditions.
Utilization of linear mixed-effects models to compare kinematics across groups and conditions.
Individuals post ACLR exhibited greater knee internal rotation during early landing compared to controls (p < 0.05).
During single leg forward hop, ACLR participants demonstrated reduced knee flexion by 2°–4° and ankle dorsiflexion restriction around 50 ms after initial contact.
No significant differences in knee flexion were observed during the unilateral counter movement jump task.

Abstract

Abstract Background/objective Despite returning to sport (RTS), individuals after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) may exhibit residual biomechanical alterations that are not fully captured by conventional RTS assessments. This study investigated 3D lower-limb kinematics during the critical early landing phase (0–100 ms) in individuals who had already returned to sport after ACLR, with the aim of examining how task-specific demands and localized acute fatigue influence early landing movement patterns. Methods In this secondary analysis of a publicly available 3D motion capture dataset, 19 participants post ACLR (involved limb) and 22 healthy controls (dominant limb) were assessed. Knee, ankle, and pelvic joint angles were extracted at initial contact (IC, 0 ms) and at 25, 50, 75, and 100 ms intervals. Tasks included the unilateral counter movement jump (uCMJ) and single leg forward hop (SLH) under fatigued and non-fatigued conditions. Linear mixed-effects models compared kinematics across groups and conditions. Results The ACLR group demonstrated a consistent transverse plane kinematic pattern suggestive of greater knee internal rotation during the early landing phase across all tasks ( p < 0.05). Sagittal plane strategies showed marked task dependency. During the SLH task, the ACLR group showed a stiffer landing pattern, characterized by reduced knee flexion by 2°–4° and concurrent ankle dorsiflexion restriction around 50 ms after IC. Conversely, no significant between-group differences in knee flexion were observed during the uCMJ task. Furthermore, the localized acute fatigue protocol did not significantly alter these observed inter-group discrepancies. Conclusions Individuals who had returned to sport after ACLR may retain residual early landing kinematic patterns, including a consistent transverse plane movement pattern and task specific stiff landing strategies. Future RTS assessment and post-RTS monitoring may benefit from placing greater emphasis on tasks with substantial horizontal braking demands, such as the SLH, as these tasks may provide additional information on residual early landing movement control patterns beyond conventional performance based outcomes. Rehabilitation may benefit from targeting landing quality, rotational control, and distal ankle buffering capacity.

Ask AI

Helpful

Bookmark

View Full Paper