Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Background/Objectives: Communicating genetic risk has been proposed as a motivational tool for weight control, but evidence remains limited. Methods: We conducted a randomized controlled trial among 53 overweight or obese young adults in South Korea. Participants were randomized to receive either their obesity-related genetic results with tailored lifestyle recommendations (intervention, n = 27) or genetic results limited to beauty traits (control, n = 26). Body weight and body composition were measured at baseline, 6 months, and 18 months. Primary outcome was change in body weight; secondary outcomes included body fat mass, body fat percentage, and skeletal muscle mass. Analyses used general linear and mixed models. Exploratory analyses examined effects among participants carrying ≥2 risk alleles across FTO, MC4R, and BDNF. Results: Overall, body weight and composition changes did not differ significantly between groups at 6 or 18 months. In exploratory subgroup analysis conducted among participants with obesity-related genetic risk, body weight increased in the intervention group (model-adjusted mean change, 2.68 kg; 95% CI, 2.28 to 3.09) but decreased in the control group (model-adjusted mean change, −11.58 kg; 95% CI, −1.99 to −1.18) over 18 months. Among participants with obesity-related genetic risk in the intervention group, those who reported behavior changes after receiving their genetic test results experienced modest weight reductions over 6 months compared with non-changers. Conclusions: Disclosure of obesity-related genetic information with tailored advice did not improve weight outcomes overall, but may benefit a subset of genetically susceptible individuals. Larger trials are warranted.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Jaewon Khil
Qiao-Yi Chen
Hyeonmin Gil
Nutrients
Korea University
Pohang University of Science and Technology
Dongguk University
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Khil et al. (Wed,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/6a06b8dfe7dec685947ab636 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/nu18101550