Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
The FOR2026 Conference -- The Future of Open Research: Reliable, Responsible, Equitable -- was held in Munich from 4 to 6 May, 2026. The full conference programme may be found here: https://opensciencestudies.eu/for-2026-conference/for2026-program/ The future of open research is uncertain. On the one hand, decades of activism and institutional support have placed the value and significance of intelligent strategies and formats for open research (and its dissemination) beyond doubt. Openness is central to the development of trustworthy, accountable, collaborative, and socially engaged knowledge. On the other hand, open research measures need to be tailored to diverse research conditions around the globe and across domains, which in turn requires substantial investment, local engagement, responsiveness to the ethical and social dimensions of inquiry, and attention to diversity, equity, and inclusion. The conference brought together scholars, activists, and policymakers to consider this challenging landscape and discuss the future of open research. The goal was to facilitate the development of open research practices explicitly geared to serve the public interest, which involves interrogating what may constitute that ‘public interest’ to different audiences and in different locations around the world. This upload contains slides from presentations in Session 2 -- Data Sharing and Management -- held on Monday 4 May, chaired by Kim Hajek (Technical University of Munich). Full details of presentations are as follows: 1. “Introducing OpenREL: Rights Expression Languages for Open Science and International Data Spaces – A Practitioners’ Approach”Prodromos Tsiavos, Μelios Michail Katsamakis (OpenAIRE, Athens, Greece) 2. “Solutions for responsible sharing and reuse of qualitative data” Agata Bochynska, Kirsti Klette, Torgeir Christiansen (University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway) 3. “Open Data and Biodiversity Conservation” Federica Bocchi, Joeri Witteveen (University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark) 4. “Open Research Software – From Open Source to Open Science?” Florian Mannseicher, Frank Löffler, Jan Linxweiler (de-RSE e.V. – Society for Research Software, Berlin, Germany), Robert Speck (Jülich Research Center, Jülich, Germany), Guido Juckeland (Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany), Frank Löffler (Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena, Jena, Germany), Jan Linxweiler (Technical University of Braunschweig, Braunschweig, Germany) - slides available at: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20053405 5. “The Reuse Potential of Open Government Data for Open Science: Lessons from Socio-Demographic Research in Milan, Lombardy, and ISTAT”Tatiana Lysova (University of Milan-Bicocca, Milan, Italy) 6. “And the winner is… Alphafold!”Alexandre Hocquet, Frédéric Wieber (Archives Poincaré, Nancy, France), Marcus Carrier (TU Berlin, Berlin, Germany) 7. “Negotiating Openness in Fragmented Data Ecologies: Computational Social Science between Platforms, Infrastructures, and Public Interest” Katja Mayer (University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria) - slides licensed as CC BY SA. 8. “From Values to Work: Defining Roles and Spaces of Open Research.” Alexander Schniedermann, Judith Hartstein, Clemens Blümel (German Center for Higher Education Research and Science Studies, Berlin, Germany) - see also Base4NFDI community: https://zenodo.org/communities/base4nfdi/ 9. ID40. “The Impact of Research Data Management Training in the Short and Long Term: A Mixed-Method Study” Francesca Morselli (Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands), Paula Martinez Lavanchy, Narmin Rzayeva, Nikki Grens, Gargi Kulkarni (Delft University of Technology-TUDelft, Delft, Netherlands), Carla Strubbia (Health-RI, Utrecht, Netherlands) Slides are shared with the consent of the authors. Note that only presenting authors are listed as contributors on this zenodo upload.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Kim Hajek
Technical University of Munich
School for Ethical Education
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Kim Hajek (Fri,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/6a06b8f8e7dec685947ab83d — DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20083991