Cross-Laminated Timber (CLT) has gained increasing attention as sustainable and efficient material for slab systems in construction. However, the lack of standardized design guidelines and comprehensive performance comparisons between different CLT-based slab solutions limits its widespread application, particularly in emerging markets with limited local expertise. This study aims to fill this gap by evaluating the structural performance and applicability of four CLT slab systems: (i) CLT slabs, (ii) CLT–concrete composite slabs, (iii) CLT–glued-laminated timber (GLT) beam ribbed slabs, and (iv) CLT–steel beam composite slabs. A comprehensive design methodology based on the Gamma method and Eurocode 5 is developed, critically applied, and its limitations discussed for each system, considering both ultimate and serviceability limit states, with special attention to vibration criteria and shear connection efficiency. The systems are compared in terms of maximum span, self-weight, thickness, and dynamic response under residential and office load categories. Results show that ribbed slab systems with timber or steel beams achieve the longest spans (up to 14 m for residential use), with lower self-weight, while CLT and CLT–concrete slabs exhibit maximum spans of 9 m with reduced thickness. Serviceability limit states, particularly vibration, were identified as the governing design constraints in most cases. This study provides a systematic comparison of CLT slab solutions, contributes to the development of reliable design tools, and identifies priorities for experimental validation, supporting the broader adoption of CLT in regions with growing timber construction sectors, such as Portugal.
Pereira et al. (Wed,) studied this question.