The constructive intellectual dialogue is based on moderation in contemporary Iraq

Political moderation is one of the most important words in building societies and stable political systems because of its close connection with the order of life and relations of the people on the one hand and their relationship with the ruling authority on the other hand. In view of the current differences and disputes between different political and social forces, One of the most important demands is political. However, the strengthening of its existence is in need of foundations. Different views are priorities in terms of presenting one on the other. In this context, we argue that the promotion of constructive intellectual dialogue is the most important basis for political moderation, The main objective of the research is to focus on constructive intellectual dialogue. The most prominent problem facing the idea of dialogue in general is the dialectic that accompanies it in its negative meaning (the controversial dialectic). A party of the interlocutors to prove the right of his ideas and validity and therefore tries to oblige the other party to abandon his ideas and correct them, and for the purpose of overcoming this problem must be called dialectic in the positive sense (dialectic complementarity), which works to be the ideas of each party complementary to the other party, rely Methodology of the study On the historical approach and the analytical approach , The study did not neglect the importance of the comparative approach and try to resort to it whenever the need arises. The study has reached a number of results. Perhaps the most important of these is that dialogue to make a serious contribution to the promotion of political moderation in modern Iraq must be a studied scientific dialogue, with the need to move away from the protocol dialogue based on media courtesy between people who are originally not different There is no dispute between them that calls for dialogue. In other words, dialogue should be fruitful and must be held between the different and not between the agreed. The enemies, the opponents and the opponents are the first in dialogue. The success of such a dialogue will be a fruitful success. Positive The most prominent recommendations in this regard are the emphasis on the necessity of the parties to the dialogue to abide by its object and its obligations, as well as to agree on an arbitration committee acceptable to both parties for the purpose of resorting to it