Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
ABSTRACT Autism diagnoses have increased over the past decade, prompting debate on potential causes. In September 2025, US President Donald Trump claimed that paracetamol is a ‘big factor’ in autism, citing a systematic review based solely on observational studies. The review's selective reporting, methodological flaws (including applying an environmental health rather than evidence‐based medicine framework) and lack of causal evidence provided weak justifications for its conclusions and have fuelled public confusion about paracetamol safety in pregnancy. This article critically appraises the review and examines how scientific uncertainty can be manipulated and amplified within broader public health domains.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
David J. Tunnicliffe
Miranda Cumpston
Debra Kennedy
The Medical Journal of Australia
The University of Melbourne
The University of Sydney
UNSW Sydney
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Tunnicliffe et al. (Fri,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/6a080b38a487c87a6a40d6c1 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.5694/mja2.70203