Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
This paper operationalizes the "Evaluator Discipline" required for high-fidelity automated reasoning by formalizing the Operator Proposal Layer. In complex search and transport systems, proposal mechanisms often inadvertently contaminate the evaluation process by importing implicit heuristics or "structure-as-truth. " We resolve this by establishing the Axiom of Operator Non-Authority, which strictly decouples candidate proposal generation (search) from authority evaluation (certification). The paper specifies the Guarded Descent Law, a lexicographic acceptance protocol ordered by primary Phi₁, secondary Gamma₂, and tertiary Xi obstruction metrics, gated by a hard closure-ratio guard Rcl. By enforcing operator passivity, we ensure that search systems can explore candidate field evolutions while remaining structurally incapable of short-circuiting the independent evaluator's certification criteria. This framework provides a rigorous foundation for building audit-compliant reasoning engines that are robust against "shortcut" certification and search-layer contamination. Key Contributions: Formalization of the Axiom of Operator Non-Authority and the Evaluator Supremacy Theorem. Definition of the Guarded Descent Law for multi-channel L1 obstruction systems. Operational separation of Proposal Generation (Transport) from Authority Evaluation (Certification). Specification of non-commutative operator interactions and their observable residuals in the diagnostic space.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
JEREMY H. CARROLL
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
JEREMY H. CARROLL (Fri,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/6a095c147880e6d24efe220f — DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20213064
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: