This preprint is the second module of the TEBAC Hodge program. It develops the variation-theoretic and Hodge-locus infrastructure needed for a Clay-compatible modular attack on the rational Hodge conjecture. The module does not claim a completed proof of the Hodge conjecture. Its purpose is to organize the passage from the fixed residual obstruction package of HODGE-I to the later detector no-loss theorem target. Starting from the HODGE-I carrier and obstruction dataXᵖ: = H^2p (X, Q) H^p, p (X), ᵖ (X): =spanₐ\\, cl (Z): Z X algebraic of codimension p\, \, Xᵖ: =KXᵖ/Aᵖ (X), paper introduces variation of Hodge structure, the Gauss--Manin local system, Hodge loci, and algebraicity windows as the natural geometric environment in which residual Hodge classes and algebraic cycle classes can be compared. The Cattani--Deligne--Kaplan theorem is used only as an admissible infrastructure theorem asserting the algebraicity of Hodge loci in the base of an algebraic family. The module explicitly separates this base-algebraicity statement from the still-unproved cycle-algebraicity assertion required by the Hodge conjecture. The main output of HODGE-II is a precise reduction of the next decisive front to detector completeness: (₊ₗ㵵) ^Aᵖ (X) =0. , the later HODGE-III module must prove that every nonzero rational Hodge detector\0 (KXᵖ) ^ detected by some algebraic cycle class: \ (cl (Z) ) 0. \ Thus HODGE-II closes the variation/Hodge-locus/algebraicity-window module of the TEBAC Hodge program and prepares the first genuine battlefront toward the full Clay-level Hodge conjecture: detector no-loss and algebraic cycle separation.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Tosho Lazarov Karadzhov
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Tosho Lazarov Karadzhov (Mon,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0d4fd2f03e14405aa9b4ea — DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20275905