What does this research mean for the field?

The North Carolina Court of Appeals ruled against the former student-athlete in the case of Dales v. Gardner-Webb University. Novelty: ClaimNovelty.INCREMENTAL. Consensus alignment: ConsensusAlignment.NEUTRAL.

What question did this study set out to answer?

The central aim is to assess the legal responsibilities of universities towards former student-athletes.

May 20, 2026

Court rules against former student‐athlete

Key Points

The central aim is to assess the legal responsibilities of universities towards former student-athletes.
Examined case law related to student-athlete liability
Analyzed the implications of court decisions on university policies
Considered prior cases for legal precedent
Court ruled against the former student-athlete, affirming university's stance on liability.
Set a legal precedent affecting future cases involving universities and student-athletes.

Abstract

CASE NAME: Dales v. Gardner‐Webb University , No. COA25‐699 (N.C. Ct. App. 03/04/26).

Mark Helpful

Bookmark

Relay

Cite This Study

A Mon, study studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0d4fd2f03e14405aa9b53f https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/cala.70120