Abstract Rationale Advancements in simulation-based training have significantly enhanced procedural competency and patient safety. However, high-quality simulation models are often cost-prohibitive and require extensive maintenance. The advent of 3D printing technology presents a cost-effective, innovative alternative for procedural training in pulmonary and critical care medicine (PCCM). This project seeks to improve procedural competence in procedures like chest tube placement, EBUS-TBNA, Tracheostomy etc.. by integrating high-fidelity 3D-printed anatomical models into training curricula. Methods This quality improvement initiative, running from July 2025 to July 2026, uses open-source 3D anatomical models from the NIH database to produce high-fidelity anatomical representations that mimic complex thoracic and bronchial anatomy. These models are incorporated into our institution’s procedural training sessions. Training sessions are organized as dedicated didactic sessions during noon conferences, where PCCM fellows engage in hands-on practice using 3D-printed models. Peyton’s stepwise teaching approach is applied, breaking down procedures into sub-steps while providing real-time feedback. Kolb’s Experiential Learning Theory is also incorporated through active experimentation, where fellows apply knowledge and skills in a simulated setting, testing and refining their techniques. After each hands-on session, fellows participate in a debriefing for real-time feedback from peers and instructors. A prioritization quadrant based on impact and feasibility is used to guide brainstorming on clinical needs and innovative concepts, with faculty offering expert feedback. Structured pre- and post-training assessments evaluate improvements in trainee confidence, procedural skills, and anatomical understanding. Results Preliminary data from this ongoing project suggests that the integration of 3D-printed anatomical models has significantly enhanced trainees’ confidence, understanding, and procedural competence. Early feedback indicates improved engagement and satisfaction, with trainees demonstrating a stronger grasp of complex anatomy and increased proficiency in performing intricate procedures. Initial quantitative outcomes highlight enhancements in procedural skills and overall clinical readiness. We will also present data on the cost-effectiveness of each procedural session. Conclusion 3D printing offers an economical, efficient, and scalable solution for enhancing procedural training in medical education. By providing realistic, hands-on practice, it allows trainees to gain critical experience in a safe, controlled environment. With its cost-effectiveness and rapid production time, 3D printing has the potential to become an indispensable tool in PCCM medical training. This abstract is funded by: Houston Methodist Hospital
Jain et al. (Fri,) studied this question.