B55-06 Addressing the Importance of Spontaneous Breathing Trial Documentation in Improving Multidisciplinary Communication in the Ventilated Patient: A Quality Improvement Initiative

Abstract Background Ventilated patients in the intensive care unit are often complex and require multiple care team members including bedside nurses, respiratory therapists, advanced practice providers, and physicians. A Quality Improvement initiative was created to address any barriers in communication. Spontaneous breathing trials (SBT) are often used as a surrogate for multidisciplinary communication. Both Respiratory therapist (RT) and provider led spontaneous breathing trial protocols are often performed but not necessarily documented or communicated appropriately. Our primary aim was to increase spontaneous breathing trial documentation from a baseline of 12% to 80% with a counterbalance of not increasing the 24-hour reintubation rate. Methods Using the DMAIC framework, we defined the gap in quality by getting baseline patient data for 3 months including SBT completion rate, SBT documentation rate, time to first SBT, total time on ventilator, 24-hour reintubation rate, and total ICU days. All care team members including providers, RTs, and nurses completed a 10-questions Likert 5-scale survey regarding their views of multidisciplinary communication and SBT completion. We identified the lack of documentation of SBTs and implemented a standardized respiratory therapy shift summary note which included SBT details and major ventilator changes. We then collected the same data over 3 months after implementation. Results Post intervention analysis revealed documentation of daily spontaneous breathing trials improved from 12% to 79%. Pre and post intervention means for patient focused outcomes were statistically unchanged for time to first SBT 26 hours vs 32 hours (p = 0.16), Total ventilator time 5.6 vs 5.4 (p = 0.83), total ICU days 1.9 days vs 2.7 days (p = 0.11), and reintubation rate 14% vs 15%.Survey results showed that there was a statistically significant improvement in overall satisfaction regarding multidisciplinary communication, satisfaction regarding ventilator management discussion on rounds, and if documentation amount was appropriate. Also, there was a significant improvement in the percentage of care team members that were aware of daily SBTs occurring. Conclusion The implementation of RT shift summary greatly improved staff member satisfaction, multidisciplinary discussion during rounds, and awareness of SBT occurrence among providers, RTs, and nurses. While patient centered outcomes were statistically unchanged over this very brief period of observation, having better staff satisfaction and communication may eventually lead to improved outcomes over time and can lead to further analysis to avoid mishaps that can arise from miscommunication. This abstract is funded by: None