Abstract Rationale Biologic therapies have transformed severe asthma management and disease remission is increasingly observed as an achievable treatment goal. However, few real-world US-based asthma remission studies after biologic initiation exist. Here we evaluate clinical remission rates at 12 months after biologic initiation in a large electronic health record (EHR)-based cohort in a major US city. Methods We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients with asthma who initiated a biologic (Benralizumab, Mepolizumab, Tezepelumab, Dupilumab or Omalizumab) between 01/01/2017 and 05/01/2025 at Penn Medicine. We identified patients with asthma as having a primary asthma diagnosis code and no COPD diagnosis. Biologic initiation date was defined as the first date of biologic prescription recorded in the EHR among patients with adequate follow-up, defined as ≥ 9 months of documented clinical encounters within the 12-month assessment post biologic initiation. Clinical remission was defined using a 3-component definition adapted from registry studies: 1) no asthma exacerbations, 2) no oral corticosteroid (OCS) use, and 3) minimal rescue medication use (≤2 short-acting beta-agonist SABA prescriptions) as a proxy for symptom control. In a subset of patients with available spirometry data, we assessed 4-component remission by adding stable lung function (FEV180% predicted OR ≥ 100 mL increase from baseline) as a fourth component as reported in registry studies. Results Among 1,465 patients who initiated their first biologic therapy, 465 (31.7%) had adequate follow-up and were included in the primary analysis. Included patients were mostly female(71%), white (56%) and privately insured (51%). At 12 months, 157 of 465 patients(33.8%; 95% CI: 29.5-38.3%) achieved 3-component clinical remission. Individual component rates were: no exacerbations (45.8%), no OCS prescription (45.8%), and minimal SABA prescription (61.1%). In the subset with available spirometry data (n = 48, 10.3% of primary cohort), mean baseline predicted FEV1 was 61.6% (SD 20.7%), with no significant change at 12-month follow-up (61.1%, SD 23.2%). FEV1 improvement (80% predicted or ≥ 100 mL increase from baseline) was achieved by 19 of 40 patients (47.5%). In this spirometry subset, 14 of 48 patients (29.2%) achieved 3-component remission, and 6 of 48 (12.5%; 95% CI:4.7-25.2%) achieved 4-component remission including lung function improvement. Conclusion One-third of patients prescribed biologics achieved clinical remission 12 months after biologic initiation. The addition of lung function criteria in a small subset indicated substantially reduced remission rates, highlighting the challenge of achieving complete multi-domain remission, particularly in patients with significant baseline airflow obstruction. This abstract is funded by: NHLBI
Gomez et al. (Fri,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: