Scalar hierarchy metrics conflate structurally distinct field configurations. Three configurations of a 100-node field — an intact minority cluster, a Lévy-driven transient spike, and a hub-forced bifurcation — each produce H≈0. 33, yet differ mechanistically and require different interventions. We introduce a hierarchy vector (C, A, D) — Centralization, Asymmetry, Dominance — as a diagnostic framework for structural regimes in RCR (Recursion-Collapse-Recombination) dynamical systems. The central formal result (Proposition 1) is that no weighted linear scalar of (C, A, D) can replace the vector: every such scalar produces at least 43 structurally conflated timesteps across a 500-step trajectory, while H (the natural scalar) conflates 110. Complementing this, six pre-registered robustness claims hold across seeds, partition methods, parameter perturbations, and adversarial conditions. The C–A anti-correlation (r=−0. 677±0. 032) and D near-independence (MI<0. 14) survive ±10% parameter perturbation and four partition methods (93–97% agreement). The analytical D ceiling (D=hub/ (N·|R|ₘaj+hub) ) matches observation within 7% — the result is predictability of the ceiling, not mere smallness of D. The framework is computable on any real-valued field R (t) without presupposing RCR architecture. Practitioners working with any continuous-valued ABM can apply (C, A, D) directly using the three formulas in Section 3, with no dependence on RCR architecture or parameter choices. Across a 500-step trajectory, three structural phases are identified algorithmically from (C, A, D) alone, with phase boundaries stable across 10 seeds. Core results are cross-validated under a second RCR architecture (Model 5) and, in the cross-model validation of Section 8, against Hegselmann–Krause, Deffuant, and noisy bounded confidence — confirming that (C, A, D) correctly identifies distinct structural regimes across architecturally unrelated continuous-opinion dynamics models, including noise-sustained minority persistence absent from scalar measures.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Justin D. Gallant
Institute for Doctoral Studies in the Visual Arts
Institute for Doctoral Studies in the Visual Arts
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Justin D. Gallant (Sun,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0d5122f03e14405aa9d7d5 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20248741
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: