Persistent uncertainty in translating low-field nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) T2 relaxation spectra into geometrically meaningful pore–throat metrics has long hindered the quantitative characterization of tight reservoirs. To address this issue, this study develops an enhanced conversion framework that incorporates scale-dependent pore geometry, enabling more realistic estimation of pore–throat radius distributions. Core samples were collected from the first member of the Shanxi Formation and the eighth member of the Shihezi Formation in the Ordos Basin. A comprehensive experimental dataset was established, including porosity and permeability measurements, X-ray diffraction (XRD) mineral analysis, NMR experiments, high-pressure mercury intrusion (HPMI), and constant-rate mercury injection (CRMI). The results demonstrate that total clay content exhibits weak correlations with pore size and porosity. In contrast, the occurrence and morphology of specific clay minerals exert significant control on pore connectivity and flow behavior. In particular, fibrous illite increases pore–throat complexity, while early chlorite coatings help preserve primary intergranular pores. A single geometric model cannot fully represent the complex pore–throat system in tight sandstones. For pores, a spherical geometry is most appropriate and indeed necessary. Smaller throats connecting these pores often exhibit geometries more consistent with cylindrical shapes. Within the coarse pore size range, large pores dominate the reservoir space and generally exhibit geometries that better conform to a spherical shape. And larger pores dominate the volumetric contribution in the coarse pore-size range. These observations suggest that a scale-dependent composite model could further improve the accuracy of NMR-based pore-size estimations. Therefore, the spherical-pore model provides a physically meaningful framework for characterizing pore structures in tight reservoirs. At the same time, incorporating scale-dependent considerations offers a promising avenue for future methodological development.
Song et al. (Tue,) studied this question.