Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) are among the most persistent and ubiquitous anthropogenic contaminants due to the exceptional strength of the carbon–fluorine bond. This comprehensive narrative review critically evaluates state-of-the-art remediation technologies for PFAS across aqueous, solid, and subsurface matrices, with emphasis on destructive approaches that achieve mineralization rather than sequestration. Drawing on peer-reviewed literature, regulatory documents, and field demonstrations (primarily 2016–2025), the review examines conventional sorption and pump-and-treat systems, advanced oxidation/reduction processes, thermal and mechanochemical destruction, biological and phytoremediation strategies, pretreatment/concentration technologies, in situ methods, and hybrid systems. Key topics addressed include analytical challenges in verifying true mineralization, byproduct toxicity, cost-effectiveness, performance against short-chain and novel PFAS replacements (e.g., GenX, PFBS), and the regulatory–technology interface at stringent MCLs such as the U.S. EPA’s 4 ng L⁻¹ threshold. Comparative analysis shows that while sorption technologies enable drinking-water compliance, only high-temperature thermal processes, supercritical water oxidation (SCWO), hydrothermal alkaline treatment (HALT), and optimized reductive/electrochemical systems consistently approach complete defluorination. Field-scale case studies highlight practical viability, yet economic burdens, matrix effects, and the formation of short-chain byproducts remain major limitations. The review identifies research priorities and advocates integrated treatment trains to close the widening gap between regulatory demands and technological capability.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
C.C. Ezike
Nnamdi Azikiwe University
Nnamdi Azikiwe University
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
C.C. Ezike (Sun,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0ea15cbe05d6e3efb5fe84 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20159015
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: