Robotic mitral valve repair in octogenarians with degenerative mitral regurgitation achieved a 5-year overall survival of 80.3% compared to 97.3% in younger patients, with 100% freedom from reoperation.
Cohort (n=412)
No
Does robotic mitral valve repair provide safe and durable outcomes in patients aged ≥80 years with degenerative mitral regurgitation compared to younger patients?
412 patients who underwent robotic mitral valve repair (RMVr) for degenerative mitral regurgitation (DMR) from 2018 to 2025, divided into an elderly group (age ≥80 years; n=42) and a younger group (age <80 years; n=370).
Robotic mitral valve repair (RMVr) in patients aged ≥80 years
Robotic mitral valve repair (RMVr) in patients aged <80 years
Safety (hospital mortality, stroke, conversions to sternotomy, re-explorations for bleeding, new renal replacement therapy) and durability (overall survival, freedom from cerebrovascular events, reoperation, and moderate or greater mitral regurgitation at 5 years)hard clinical
Robotic mitral valve repair is a feasible and durable surgical option for selected octogenarians with degenerative mitral regurgitation, offering similar freedom from reoperation and recurrent MR at 5 years compared to younger patients.
Absolute Event Rate: 80.3% vs 97.3%
p-value: p=<0.001
Background: Transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (TEER) has increasingly been used for elderly patients with degenerative mitral regurgitation (DMR), while minimally invasive surgical approaches such as robotic mitral valve repair (RMVr) may offer durable repair with reduced invasiveness. We evaluated the safety and durability of RMVr in octogenarians with DMR and assessed its role in contemporary treatment strategies by comparison with younger patients as a reference cohort. Methods and Results: We retrospectively analyzed 412 patients who underwent RMVr for DMR from 2018 to 2025. Patients were divided into an elderly group (E; age ≥80 years; n=42) and a younger group (Y; age <80 years; n=370). Octogenarians had higher operative risk with more atrial fibrillation, heart failure, pulmonary hypertension, and renal dysfunction. Cardiopulmonary bypass and cross-clamp times, repair complexity, and concomitant procedures were comparable. In the E group, hospital mortality and stroke were both 2.4%; there were no conversions to sternotomy, re-explorations for bleeding, or new renal replacement therapy. At discharge, mitral regurgitation was none or trivial in most patients in both groups. At 5 years, overall survival was lower in the E group (80.3% vs. 97.3%), but freedom from cerebrovascular events, reoperation, and moderate or greater mitral regurgitation was similar. Conclusions: RMVr is a feasible and durable surgical option in selected octogenarians considering patient-specific risk, anatomical suitability, and institutional expertise.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Miho Kuroda
Chiba-Nishi General Hospital
Taisuke Nakayama
Chiba-Nishi General Hospital
Kasumi Tamagawa
Chiba-Nishi General Hospital
Circulation Reports
Chiba-Nishi General Hospital
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Kuroda et al. (Wed,) conducted a cohort in Degenerative mitral valve regurgitation (n=412). Robotic mitral valve repair vs. Younger patients (age <80 years) undergoing robotic mitral valve repair was evaluated on 5-year overall survival (p=<0.001). Robotic mitral valve repair in octogenarians with degenerative mitral regurgitation achieved a 5-year overall survival of 80.3% compared to 97.3% in younger patients, with 100% freedom from reoperation.
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0ff6d5d674f7c03778dc65 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1253/circrep.cr-26-0052