During June and July 2006 Oxford Archaeology (OA) carried out a field evaluation at the Gainsborough Building, Beau street, Bath on behalf of Bath Hotel and Spa Co. Ltd. The work consisted of nine trenches, measuring between 0.8m x 1.0m and 1.25m x 2.7m. These were dug in the basement of a multi-period building, whose three main elements were erected in 1825, 1964 and the 1890s. It was originally built as the United Hospital for Bath (later Royal United Hospital- RUH), but in 1928 was sold and in 1932 opened as the Bath Technical College. It remained in academic use until 2005 when it was sold to the present owners for the conversion to a hotel. The work in the 1860s had revealed significant and extensive Roman and possibly medieval layers under the western and southern part of the site. Correspondence at the time suggested that the remains had been substantially preserved under the then new construction. The evaluation revealed these remains in some trenches, but in other, antiquarian excavation combined with foundation trenching had removed archaeological stratification. Trenches on the southern side of the site revealed that stratified archaeological deposits exist just below the basement floor level of the 1890s work and are of medieval origin. Under the 1825 block, along Beau Street, excavation to a depth of 1.33m below the basement floor failed to find archaeological deposits at one point, and at another, they occurred at around 10m below. In the Bath context, the remains are significant and important. Development proposals are being progressed with mitigation in situ as the appropriate response. Some limited mitigation excavation may be required, but designs are being developed to keep this to the absolute minimum necessary for the proposal. In November 2006 Oxford Archaeology (OA) carried out an additional investigation to the field evaluation carried out in June at the Gainsborough Building, Beau Street, Bath (NGR ST74966460) on behalf of Bath Hotel and Spa Ltd. The work consisted of four trenches. One was an extension of one of those dug in June and the other three were new. The trenches were intended to provide information to confirm that the archaeological impact of foundation and pool design of the proposed development of the Gainsborough Building be mitigated successfully by the design proposals contained in the evaluation report. Two trenches were dug to investigate the depth of the footings of the southern range fronting Lower Borough Walls, and two were opened to confirm the presence and depth of archaeological deposits in areas that be affected by the construction of the intended pools. It was found that the depths and character of the deposits in the original evaluation trenches could be considered typical. The results of the southern two trenches were less clear. Investigations along the southern wall were confused by the presence of probably 18th century footings and more Roman remains, preventing fuller interpretation. The northern foundations were over 2.6 metres deep, but archaeological deposits continued to at least the same depth. Nonetheless, by comparing the known and extrapolated depths of the pre-Roman ground surface in the vicinity, a strong case can be that the footings of the existing buildings do continue into the natural strata and that the base of the archaeological deposits are not likely to be more than about 0.30 metres below the base of the deepest trench. The work in the 1860s had revealed significant and extensive Roman and possibly medieval layers under the western and southern part of the site. Correspondence at the time suggested that the remains had been substantially preserved under the then new construction. The evaluation revealed these remains in some trenches, but in other, antiquarian excavation combined with foundation trenching had removed archaeological stratification.
Peter Davenport (Sun,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: