Diabetes Mellitus and Stroke: Pathophysiological Connections and Therapeutic Potential of GLP-1 and GLP-1/GIP Receptor Agonists

Both diabetes mellitus (DM) and stroke are major global health challenges with high morbidity and mortality. DM is a major risk factor for stroke, contributing to both increased incidence and worse clinical outcomes. Incretin-based therapies, including glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs), as well as dual agonists like tirzepatide, have demonstrated significant cardiovascular benefits, raising interest in their potential cerebrovascular effects. This narrative review examines the pathophysiological links between DM and stroke and summarizes recent clinical evidence on the efficacy of GLP-1 RAs and dual GLP-1/GIP receptor agonists (GLP-1/GIP RAs) in stroke prevention and management. Current evidence from large cardiovascular outcome trials supports the role of GLP-1 RAs in reducing major adverse cardiovascular events, including stroke, primarily in the context of primary and secondary prevention. Findings suggest that semaglutide and liraglutide may reduce non-fatal stroke incidence, decrease hospitalizations, and improve neurological outcomes in patients with prior stroke. Comparative analyses of major trials suggest that, although stroke reduction may be a class effect of GLP-1 RAs, meaningful differences exist between individual agents, likely due to variations in pharmacokinetics, receptor affinity, and study populations. Additionally, much of the evidence in acute stroke derives from early-phase or ongoing trials, warranting cautious interpretation. Novel therapies, including orforglipron and retatrutide, as well as combinations like Maridebart cafraglutide and CagriSema, may expand future therapeutic options for individuals at high cerebrovascular risk. GLP-1-based therapies show promising neurovascular effects, but large-scale, long-term studies are needed to define their role in post-stroke management and cerebrovascular risk reduction. Overall, GLP-1 RAs should currently be regarded primarily as agents for long-term vascular risk reduction rather than established therapies for acute stroke. While potential neuroprotective effects are emerging, these require confirmation in adequately powered randomized trials. Future studies should aim to identify the patient subgroups most likely to benefit and to determine whether specific agents confer advantages in acute cerebrovascular contexts. A better understanding of the mechanisms underlying potential neuroprotection will be essential to determine whether these therapies can be effectively integrated into stroke management strategies.