Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
The electron mass formula mₑ = (αm_π/2) (1 + 2α√7) = 0. 51150 MeV was established in Paper CXXI v1, where the factor 2 was attributed to "two chiralities traversing the boundary. " This paper provides the deeper derivation: the factor 2, the spin quantum number ½, and the requirement that mass and charge waves make two traversals of the quark–lepton boundary B (1, 4) per oscillation cycle all have a single topological origin — the half-Möbius (anti-periodic) spin structure of B (1, 4) in the Klein quartic pants decomposition. The boundary B (1, 4) carries an odd Arf invariant: a fermionic wave making one circuit of B (1, 4) picks up a factor of −1 (anti-periodic boundary condition). Two circuits restore the wave to +1. This is precisely the spin-½ property. The Dirac mass, as a standing wave between the quark and lepton sectors, must close on itself, requiring two traversals of B (1, 4). Each traversal costs α × sec (τ) = α√7 (electromagnetic coupling times the Fano secant). The total correction 2α√7 = 3. 86% follows. The same anti-periodic structure applies to the charge wave, setting the renormalisation point of α at the quark–lepton boundary. Two predictions: P204, the electron mass formula (same as v1) ; P205, the spin-½ property of all first-generation leptons is a theorem from the Arf invariant of B (1, 4), not an assumption. Part of the One-Octonion Brane-Bulk Framework series. Anchor DOI: 10. 5281/zenodo. 19120873. Community: one-octonion-brane-bulk. Author: Bharathi Dasan Jagadeesan, M. D. , University of Minnesota. ORCID: 0000-0002-1143-941X.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Bharathi Jagadeesan
University of Minnesota System
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Bharathi Jagadeesan (Tue,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0ff39dd674f7c03778c517 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20300127
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: