All known theories of physics take the existence of laws as a tacit premise, yet none explains the dynamical origin of law itself. This paper constructs a self-consistent generative framework to fill this gap. We begin from the sole fact requiring no justification: **change exists** — measuring the same physical system twice yields different results. Endowing this fact with mathematical expression requires distinguishing the component of change attributable to structure from the residue not yet so attributed, thereby yielding the Recursive Constitutive Equation (RCE): ₍+₁ = Rₙ + ₙ. 1 Here R is the **constitutive map** and ₙ the **unstructured factor**, the two being mutually defined within the RCE as two faces of a single dynamical process. The RCE is not a law externally imposed on the system but the mathematical transcription of the fact of "change": no simpler form can distinguish attributable change from unattributable change. Under the hypothesis of a normed state space, the RCE is the minimal equational structure that provides a complete description of structural change. This paper explicitly acknowledges three axiomatic premises of the RCE: a discrete order structure (the relation of before and after), a normed state space (S, \|\|), and compositionality of maps. These three constitute the minimal logical grammar required to state "change, " presupposing no specific physical law, symmetry, or form of matter. Within this framework, the extreme case in which R is absent is defined as the **ground state**: all possible states obey a maximum-entropy measure, and occupies the entire dynamical space. We rigorously prove: ** (P3) ** ordered dynamical fragments carrying a self-map emerge in the ground state with positive probability; ** (P4) ** fragments that fail to satisfy the membrane-locking condition dissipate almost surely in finite steps, while fragments that satisfy it survive almost surely indefinitely; ** (P5) ** the self-map carried by a surviving fragment is the primordial constitutive map R, driving the RCE from the ground state into the excited state. Thereby "Where do laws come from? " receives a fundamental dynamical answer: laws are the surviving outcome of membrane-locking selection, not an a priori given premise.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Lin Sun
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Lin Sun (Wed,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0ff39dd674f7c03778c690 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20303836