This technical report presents the Quantum Bio Scout computational pipeline for de novo antibody–drug conjugate (ADC) linker–conjugation design and mechanism-aware in-silico validation, focused on HER2–Trastuzumab ADC candidates. The work describes an end-to-end, reproducible, cost-bounded in-silico framework that generates and ranks ADC linker–payload candidates for the HER2-targeting antibody Trastuzumab. The pipeline integrates four orthogonal computational methods: AutoDock Vina docking, OpenMM molecular dynamics relaxation, Boltz-2 single-sample co-folding, and Boltz-2 ensemble variance analysis. Additional quantum-inspired and quantum-simulation modules, including Pasqal MIS and Qrunch reaction-energy evaluation, are incorporated as part of the Stage 8 validation workflow. A cohort of 574 in-silico Trastuzumab conjugates was generated from a curated library of 170 ADC linkers and 172 payloads, then benchmarked against five clinically approved or phase-3 HER2 ADC anchors: T-DM1, T-DXd, RC48, SYD985, and SHR-A1811. The Trastuzumab Fab × HER2 extracellular domain IV complex was recovered by Boltz-2 with an interface ipTM of 0.917 and complex pLDDT of 0.937. The conjugate cohort produced 26 Grade-A and 202 Grade-B candidates, with further OpenMM MD validation and benchmark scoring applied across the candidate space. This report also highlights an important mechanism-aware limitation of structure-prediction confidence metrics: Boltz-2 ipTM values were more consistent for tubulin-directed warheads than for topoisomerase-I payloads, where DNA-cleavage ternary-complex biology is not fully represented by the model. Therefore, this work positions the pipeline as a quantitative pre-screening and prioritization framework, not as a substitute for wet-laboratory validation. All findings are computational and should be interpreted as in-silico research outputs only. No therapeutic, clinical efficacy, safety, or regulatory claims are made. Wet experimental validation remains required before any biological or translational conclusion can be drawn.
Sungil Oh (Mon,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: