Digital health technologies are increasingly used in chronic disease management, yet the literature still shows a persistent gap between promising pilot projects and durable health-system value. This perspective argues that the central challenge is not a shortage of digital innovation, but inadequate care-grade integration: the extent to which digital tools are embedded within clinical workflows, workforce roles, reimbursement arrangements, interoperability, data governance, and patient support. Drawing on recent reviews, implementation studies, qualitative syntheses, and value-framework papers across chronic disease settings, we examine why uptake remains uneven and why apparently successful tools often fail to scale. Three themes recur. First, evaluations still overemphasize acceptability and adoption relative to clinical, service, and equity outcomes. Second, sustained use depends on workflow fit, burden, trust, and patient preferences rather than usability alone. Third, equity and governance are often treated as downstream considerations instead of core design constraints. We propose a care-grade roadmap built on operational co-design, theory-informed implementation, equity-first delivery, multidimensional value assessment, and learning health-system feedback loops. Digital chronic care is more likely to deliver durable benefit when technologies are designed, evaluated, and funded as components of service redesign rather than as stand-alone tools.
Lee et al. (Fri,) studied this question.