Introduction In contexts of institutional erosion and polarization, authoritarian expressions among young people have emerged, straining democracy and civic coexistence. This review aims to identify the main manifestations of authoritarianism in youth social life and analyze their implications for democratic coexistence. Methods A systematic review of the literature (2015-2025) was conducted in journals indexed in Web of Science and Scopus, following the PRISMA protocol. Out of n = 681 studies identified, n = 43 were selected for final analysis. Results Four analytical dimensions were identified: social dominance, traditionalism-sexism-fundamentalism, mental health-parenting styles, and contextual-cultural perspectives, which expand the classical understanding of the phenomenon. Discussion These dimensions highlight the increasing validation of authoritarian values linked to the rise of violence and social inequality, positioning authoritarianism as a relational and situated phenomenon that threatens democratic coexistence.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Gustavo Troncoso-Tejada
Universidad de La Frontera
Karina Polanco-Levicán
Universidad Santo Tomás
José Luis Gálvez-Nieto
Universidad de La Frontera
Frontiers in Psychology
Universidad Complutense de Madrid
Universidad de La Frontera
Universidad Santo Tomás
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Troncoso-Tejada et al. (Fri,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1537bab5d9c58d83e8c237 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1794108
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: