This paper establishes the complete ultimate philosophical foundation of Time Field Theory (TFT). It takes the self-referential consistency of time as a measuring ruler as the core ontological premise, and systematically clarifies the axiomatic status, logical hierarchy, methodological superiority, and cosmological paradigm difference of TFT. We prove that spacetime flux conservation is not an additional assumption, but the mathematical expression of the self-consistency of time as a self-referential measuring benchmark. TFT uniquely predicts cosmic expansion, the Hubble constant, and apparent acceleration purely from its closed axiom system, rather than fitting observations by introducing free parameters such as dark energy and dark matter. Compared with GR+ΛCDM, TFT follows the path of axiomatic derivation rather than observational fitting. The cosmic redshift and time evolution are derived as inevitable consequences of the global time field decay, which fundamentally solves the double-logic paradox of cosmic expansion in standard cosmology. This article provides the most complete ontological interpretation and methodological positioning for TFT, making it a self-contained, logically closed, and fundamentally consistent alternative to general relativity at the philosophical and physical levels.
Huowang Huang (Sat,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: