Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
At what spectral value does the brain cross from wakefulness into sleep? Across 3, 305 individual Wake→N1 transitions from 153 sleeping adults, the EEG spectral slope approaches √2 ≈ 1. 414 most closely at the exact epoch of clinically staged sleep onset — with a proximity minimum of |β − √2| = 0. 015 at the first N1 epoch, confirmed at 100% bootstrap confidence and replicated in an independent cohort. The value √2 is not a post-hoc observation. It is predicted a priori from the information geometry of spectral statistics: any one-parameter exponential family in the spectral exponent β carrying the involution β ↦ 2/β has a unique self-dual fixed point at β* = √2. The algebraic-robustness theorem (§S3. 7) proves this holds generically — all four candidate spectral families tested (Weibull, Tsallis, log-normal, generalized gamma) predict the same fixed point. The Weibull family is the parsimonious AIC winner; the log-normal is decisively rejected on fit quality. Table S3b verifies that √2 is a geometrically distinguished minimum (not merely a stationary point) on every empirically relevant family, with the minimum becoming deeper on the generalized-gamma manifold. How specific is the claim? A conjunction selectivity analysis (§5. 2. 2) quantifies the non-tautological empirical content: the straddle condition (H1) is near-tautological — 36% of candidate values between 1. 0 and 2. 0 would be straddled by the Wake and N1 stage means. But the conjunction of epoch-specific proximity minimum, transition specificity, and cross-cohort replication selects only 3. 5% of candidate values, producing a band 1. 405, 1. 440 — and √2 is inside it. Among the metallic-mean family of fixed-point predictions (C ∈ 1, 2, 3), only C = 2 (giving √2) falls within this band; the golden ratio φ ≈ 1. 618 (C = 1) and √3 ≈ 1. 732 (C = 3) are both excluded. The result has an honest limitation. A sub-cohort analysis (§S11. 9) shows that the full crossing (H1 + H3) replicates in the F1-winning majority (65% of subjects) but not in the F4-winning minority (27%), whose spectral baselines are systematically lower. The proximity-minimum structure (H3) is preserved across both sub-cohorts (99. 4% bootstrap for F4-winners), but the absolute calibration (H1) is population-level, not universal per-subject. This failure is consistent with the framework's stated scope: the prediction applies in the pure-power-law aperiodic regime, and F4-winners are precisely the subjects whose spectra have resolvable exponential cutoffs. This is the companion empirical paper to Paper 1, which established the golden ratio (φ ≈ 1. 618) as the fractal-dimension boundary between conscious and unconscious brain states. The two papers identify the first two members of a metallic-mean family in neural dynamics: φ (C = 1) organises the resting-state consciousness boundary in fractal dimension; √2 (C = 2) organises the spectral crossing during sleep onset. Companion papers in the ICP programme Paper Role DOI The Golden Ratio Organizes Neural Complexity Paper 1: φ as consciousness boundary in HFD 10. 5281/zenodo. 19152681 The Instability Compression Principle ICP empirical foundation 10. 5281/zenodo. 18099118 The Compressibility of Chaos (Ordo ab Chao) ICP theoretical 10. 5281/zenodo. 18834609 Information Geometry of the Brody Distribution Fisher metric, effective dimension, one-point layer 10. 5281/zenodo. 18879754 The α-Connection Structure of the Brody Manifold Amari–Chentsov tensor, orbit-universality, derivative-cancellation lemma 10. 5281/zenodo. 19151206 Dual Symmetries of the Brody Statistical Manifold Z₂×Z₂ symmetry, β* = √2 spectral duality theorem 10. 5281/zenodo. 19239285 Data availability All analyses use the PhysioNet Sleep-EDF v2. 4 dataset (DOI: 10. 13026/C2X676). Analysis scripts, results JSONs, and full reproduction instructions are included in the OSF deposit accompanying this manuscript.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Jon Wiberg
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Jon Wiberg (Sat,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/6a13e88c0e02ee3982d33409 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20358008
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: