What question did this study set out to answer?

To compare the effectiveness of suction ureteral access sheaths versus standard sheaths in flexible ureteroscopy for upper urinary stones.

May 27, 2026Open Access

Comparison of suction and standard ureteral access sheath versus sheathless flexible ureteroscopy in management of upper ureteral and renal calculi

FZFouad ZanatyMenoufia University Hospitals MAMohammed AliMenoufia University Hospitals FEFatma ElserafyMenoufia University Hospitals

Key Points

To compare the effectiveness of suction ureteral access sheaths versus standard sheaths in flexible ureteroscopy for upper urinary stones.
Conducted from October 2023 to January 2025 with 90 patients
Randomized into three groups: standard UAS, suction UAS, and no UAS
Assessed operative time, vision quality, stone clearance, complications, and hospital stay.
Group A2 (suction UAS) had the shortest mean operative time (70.1 ± 10.3 min) vs Group A1 (114.3 ± 27.0 min) and Group B (125.0 ± 28.01 min), p < 0.001.
Residual stone rates were lowest in Group A2 (3.3%) vs Group A1 (10.0%) and Group B (26.7%), p = 0.035.
Need for second procedure was 26.7% in Group B vs 10.0% in Group A1; absent in Group A2, p = 0.002.

Abstract

PURPOSE: Comparative effectiveness of suction versus traditional ureteral access sheath (UAS) remains an area of ongoing research. We aim to compare the outcomes of retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) with suction and standard UAS versus without UAS in the management of renal and upper ureteric stones, with a specific focus on operative efficiency, stone-free rates, and postoperative complications. METHODS: This study was conducted between October 2023 and January 2025, including 90 patients with renal stones ≤ 3 cm and upper ureteric stones ≤ 1.5 cm. Patients were divided into three groups by random Allocation Software (version 2): Group A1 (standard UAS, n = 30), Group A2 (suction UAS, n = 30), and Group B (no UAS, n = 30). Operative time, vision quality, stone clearance, complications, and hospital stay were assessed. RESULTS: Group A2 had the shortest mean operative time (70.1 ± 10.3 min) with significantly better vision compared to Group A1 (114.3 ± 27.0 min) and Group B (125.0 ± 28.01 min) (p < 0.001). Residual stone rates were lowest in Group A2 (3.3%) compared to Group A1 (10.0%) and Group B (26.7%) (p = 0.035). The need for a second procedure was significantly higher in Group B (26.7%) compared to Group A1 (10.0%) and absent in Group A2 (p = 0.002). Hospital stay was significantly shorter in Group A2 compared to Group A1 and Group B (p = 0.005). Fever incidence (Clavien Grade II) was significantly higher in Group B (23.3%) compared to Group A1 (16.7%) and absent in Group A2 (p = 0.005). CONCLUSION: Suction ureteral access sheaths in flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy for renal stones ≤ 3 cm and upper ureteric stones ≤ 1.5 cm was associated with improved stone clearance, reduced operative time and hospital stay, provide better endoscopic vision, minimized infectious complications and need for second procedure, compared to standard UAS or no sheath. However, outcomes may be influenced by surgeon experience and familiarity with suction-assisted systems. Prospective multicenter studies with larger sample sizes and varying surgeon experience levels are recommended.

Ask AI

Helpful

Bookmark

View Full Paper