Effective management of organic wastes is essential for green and low-carbon development. Conventional technologies, including incineration, pyrolysis, hydrothermal carbonization (HTC), gasification, anaerobic digestion (AD), and composting, have supported waste reduction and basic resource recovery, but they remain limited in high-efficiency conversion and high-value utilization. This review comparatively evaluates these conventional routes together with advanced and intensified technologies, including microwave-assisted pyrolysis (MAP), plasma treatment, supercritical water gasification (SCWG), and flash joule heating (FJH), with emphasis on suitable feedstocks, performance characteristics, application boundaries, and integration potential. In general, wastes with high moisture content are more suitable for HTC, AD, and SCWG, whereas relatively dry wastes and wastes with high carbon content are more suitable for pyrolysis, gasification, plasma treatment, and FJH upgrading. The review also discusses representative integrated pathways, such as HTC-SCWG, pyrolysis and plasma coupling, AD and gasification coupling, and pyrolysis and FJH coupling, which may improve carbon conversion, broaden product portfolios, and reduce residual pollutants. However, large-scale implementation is still constrained by feedstock heterogeneity, heat and mass transfer limitations, catalyst deactivation, reactor corrosion, and system cost. Overall, no single technology is universally optimal; technology selection should depend on feedstock properties, moisture content, and target products.
Tian et al. (Wed,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: