Peptide therapeutics have emerged as a versatile class of biomolecules bridging the gap between small-molecule drugs and large biologics. Advantages of such molecules include high target specificity, potent bioactivity and reduced off-target toxicity. Despite these, broader clinical translation remains constrained by inherent limitations like poor metabolic stability, rapid renal clearance, limited membrane permeability and scalable synthesis. This review aims to systematically integrate advances in peptide science across natural discovery, synthetic methodologies, structural engineering, and translational delivery systems, while identifying critical research gaps hindering clinical adoption. We highlight diverse natural sources of bioactive peptides, including plant- (lunasin), animal- (Val-Pro-Pro (VPP) and Ile-Pro-Pro (IPP)), microbial- (nisin and cyclosporine), marine- (dolastatins) and venom-derived (chlorotoxin and ω-conotoxin MVIIA (ziconotide)) agents. Advances in solid-phase peptide synthesis (SPPS), green chemistry, and catalytic strategies are discussed alongside emerging in silico approaches, including artificial intelligence-driven sequence design and molecular modeling. Structural modifications such as cyclization, hydrocarbon stapling, PEGylation, and lipidation are critically evaluated for their role in enhancing pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties. Furthermore, nanoformulation strategies, including self-assembling peptides and cell-penetrating systems, are examined for their potential to overcome biological barriers. Importantly, this review identifies key unresolved challenges, including the lack of predictive models for peptide delivery systems, safety concerns associated with long-term modifications, and limited in vivo validation of naturally derived peptides. Addressing these gaps through integrated computational and experimental approaches will be essential for advancing next-generation peptide therapeutics. Collectively, this work provides a comprehensive framework for the rational design and translation of peptide-based precision medicines.
Khan et al. (Fri,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: